Politics Information

Is The Bill Of Rights Necessary?


The Bill of Rights to our Constitution caused -- and still causes - some contradiction, confusion and danger with the Constitution itself. It is unfortunate that a bill of rights was included with the Constitution. Due to a general misunderstanding about the Constitution at the time of its ratification, a bill of rights was added to the Constitution in order to obtain ratification of the Constitution itself:

"In the course of the foregoing review of the Constitution I have taken notice of, and endeavored to answer most of the objections which have appeared against it. There, however, remain a few which either did not fall naturally under any particular head or were forgotten in their proper places. These shall now be discussed. ? The most considerable of these remaining objections is that the Constitution of the convention contains no bill or rights." Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers #84.

Indeed, during the convention itself, a motion to prepare a bill of rights to the Constitution was "passed unanimously in the negative." September 12, 1787; Notes Of Debates In The Federal Convention Of 1787 Reported By James Madison.

But why no bill of rights?

"A minute detail of particular rights is certainly far less applicable to a Constitution like that under consideration, which is merely intended to regulate the general political interests of the nation, than to a constitution which has the regulation of every species of personal and private concerns.

It has been several times truly remarked that bills of rights are, in their origin, stipulations between kings and their subjects, abridgements of prerogative in favor of privilege, reservations of rights not surrendered to the prince. Such was Magna Carta, obtained by the barons, sword in hand, from King John. Such was the subsequent confirmation of that charter by subsequent princes. Such was the Petition of Right assented to by Charles the First in the beginning of his reign. Such, also, was the Declaration of Right presented by the Lords and Commons to the Prince of Orange in 1688, and afterwards thrown into the form of an act of Parliament called the Bill of Rights.

It is evident, therefore, that, according to primitive signification, they have no application to constitutions, professedly founded upon the power of the people and executed by their immediate representatives and servants. Here in strictness, the people surrender nothing; and as they retain everything, they have no need of particular reservations.

The truth is, after all the declamations we have heard, that the Constitution is itself, in every rational sense, and to every useful, a bill of rights. The several bills of rights in Great Britain form its Constitution; and conversely, the constitution of each State is its bill of rights. And the proposed Constitution, if adopted, will be the bill of rights of the Union." Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers #84.

However, in the debates of the state conventions, the most criticized feature of the Constitution, voiced by the opposition, was the lack of a bill or rights:

"One criticism repeatedly advanced (against the Constitution) was the absence of a bill of rights. This matter had been discussed very briefly on the floor of the Philadelphia Convention, where George Mason had introduced a resolution, supported by Elbridge Gerry, to appoint a committee to prepare a bill of rights. Roger Sherman had replied briefly that the various state constitutions already had bills of rights, which should prove sufficient under the new government, and Mason's motion had then been defeated 10 to 0. But in the ratification controversy, absence of a federal bill of rights became a focal point of attack upon the Constitution by the Antifederalists, who pointed out that since the new government had a sphere of sovereignty of its own and functioned directly upon individuals, the absence of a bill of rights prepared the way for encroachments upon the liberties of the people.

The absence of a bill of rights proved a bargaining point for the Federalists in some of the state conventions, for they were able to pledge the adoption of a new bill or rights by amendment once the new government was established. In several conventions, among them those in Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia, the Federalists at the last moment won over certain moderates in the opposition with this understanding. Several of the state conventions submitted proposed amendments containing bills of rights at the time that they ratified. These were made the basis of the first ten amendments to the Constitution, adopted by Congress in 1789 and by the states within two years after the establishment of the new government." The American Constitution; Its Origins And Development, 5th Edition, by Alfred H. Kelly and Winfred A. Harbison, 1976, pp. 142-143.

And what danger did and does the Bill of Rights present with the Constitution itself?

"Bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers which are not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?

Why, for instance, should it be said that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed? I will not contend that such a provision would confer a regulating power; but it is evident that it would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretense for claiming that power. They might urge, with a semblance of reason, that the Constitution ought not to be charged with the absurdity of providing against the abuse of an authority which was not given, and that the provision against restraining the liberty of the press afforded a clear implication that a power to prescribe proper regulations concerning it was intended to be vested in the national government. This may serve as a specimen of the numerous handles which would be given to the doctrine of constructive powers, by the indulgence of an injudicious zeal for bills of rights." Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers #84.

To maintain the integrity of the Constitution an amendment was drafted and included in The Bill of Rights. It reads:

"The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." Amendment 9, Constitution of the United States.

Its inclusion was to prevent the rights listed in the other amendments (as well as those amendments which have been added since then) from being construed as the only rights of the people.¹ Indeed, the constitutional operation of the federal government would be exactly the same if The Bill of Rights were not there at all.

However, The Bill of Rights is a part of the Constitution. A result of a comprise based upon a misunderstanding of the Constitution itself.

_________________________________

¹ See Griswold v. State of Connecticut: 381 U.S. 479, 486-493, at footnote 4 (concurring opinion of Justice Goldberg, The Chief Justice, and Justice Brennan) [1965] get case

© 1993 Daniel Joseph Goodman

Questions? Comments! xGoodmanx@excite.com

Dan Goodman, known as J.D. Goodman or "J.D." is a legal researcher. Other articles authored by "J.D." relating to the area of law are, How Well Do Know The Constitution and State Citizenship Is Alive And Well.

Like doing your own legal research. I invite you to try my website, The Legal Connection, at http://www.angelfire.com/nb/thelegalconn/index.htm.

This article is written to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is written with the understanding that the author is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or, other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

The author, therefore, disclaims any responsibility for any liability or loss incurred as a consequence of the use and application, either directly or indirectly of any information presented herein.


MORE RESOURCES:

When office politics go too far
Bizjournals.com, NC - 3 hours ago
If so, you (the boss) are watching a classic game of office politics unfold. While politics was a hot-button topic at the watercooler during the ...


Washington Post

Eric Holder's Politics
Wall Street Journal - 21 hours ago
One of the media narratives about the Bush Administration has been its "politicization" of the Justice Department. We've always thought most of that was ...
Holder pardon makes Dems squirm MLive.com
Attorney Scott Horton on “Justice After Bush: Prosecuting an ... Democracy Now
Obama's attorney general pick: Good on privacy? CNET News
San Francisco Chronicle
all 418 news articles


Seattle Post Intelligencer

Religion and politics: Big issues behind a little ornament
Seattle Post Intelligencer - 22 hours ago
Any way you slice it, a Christmas tree is religious in nature and should not be mixed with politics such as the White House. sean98125: Axis42, ...
Video: Raw Video: White House Christmas Tree Arrives AssociatedPress
Bush Didn't Sell His Soul For Politics OneNewsNow
Vt. Artists Part of White House Christmas Tree WCAX
San Francisco Chronicle - Snohomish Times
all 318 news articles


China Daily

Don't let politics overtake appointment
Albany Times Union, NY - 11 hours ago
Hillary Rodham Clinton's Senate seat and less concerned with the appointee's politics. In these historically trying times, it is imperative to have someone ...
Obama's cabinet picks shake up NY, AZ politics The Associated Press
Dynastic Politics Lives in New York American Spectator
Top 5 possible contenders for Hillary Clinton's Senate seat Examiner.com
Washington Post - Newsday
all 603 news articles


Sify

Mortgage Plan Prompts More Bailout Politics
The Washington Independent, DC - 8 hours ago
More bailout politics, anyone? The core problem with such a plan, according to a few secondary market experts HW spoke with, is that mortgage rates have ...
Swift Boating on Denial River Smartmoney.com
all 711 news articles


CANADA FX DEBT-Canadian dollar plunges on oil, politics
Reuters - 1 hour ago
By Cameron French TORONTO, Dec 4 (Reuters) - The Canadian dollar fell for the seventh-straight day versus the US dollar on Thursday, dropping nearly 2 ...


Moore vs. Cooper? Dispute hints at politics ahead
Greenville Daily Reflector, NC - 3 hours ago
By MIKE BAKER AP RALEIGH, NC — An ongoing quarrel between Attorney General Roy Cooper and State Treasurer Richard Moore may be more than just two agencies ...


WELT ONLINE

Thai court bans prime minister, ruling party from politics
Christian Science Monitor, MA - Dec 2, 2008
The parties' leaders, including Prime Minister Somchai Wongsawat, have been banned from politics for five years. The announcement came hours after an ...
Video: Thailand Airport Shutdown Enters 3rd Day AssociatedPress
Thai PM banned from politics as court disbands ruling party Daily Nation
Carousel Politics Sin Chew Jit Poh
The National - Belfast Telegraph
all 7,677 news articles


Youth Politics Stand Out at Facing Race Conference
New America Media, CA - 4 hours ago
YO! attended a Youth and Politics workshop at the Facing Race Conference The conference opened with a post-election analysis of how the presidential ...


The Politics of Safety
Town Hall, DC - 47 minutes ago
by Mario Diaz In Massachusetts the effective reframing of this issue was the key to the success of the Governor's Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth. ...

Politics - Google News

home | site map
© 2006