Politics Information

Fundamentalist: Fascist or Common-Sense?


Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one yourself? Having grown up in a liberal democracy, being educated in the ideals of freedom of speech and expression, diversity, multi-culturalism and the political correctness that stems from such a comprehensive education, I find myself questioning whether I am a closet fascist when it comes to the way in which the British Judiciary are referring to the whole issue surrounding the London suicide bombers of 7 July and the related legal news stories stemming from this.

I cannot understand the logic of the British Judiciary in countering the British Government's call for the expulsion of a number of foreign nationals specifically identified as contributing to anti-British feeling amongst the Muslim community. For example, one of the people due for expulsion is Abu Qatada, a Jordanian who has been tried and convicted in his absence in Jordanian courts for terrorism and given a life sentence. He is known as Osama bin Laden's 'Ambassador in Europe'. Now he is concerned that if he is returned to Jordan he will face the death sentence. The question becomes one of whether we can expel someone from Britain to what may be their death? While we don't know the details of his Jordanian convictions, terrorism in the Middle East tends to be pretty deadly, so it is fair to suspect this person has been convicted of something relating to people being killed.

This is where liberal ideals and common-sense conflict - while we may agree in Human Rights Law, is it so wrong if we don't care that this man is being sent back to what might be his death? When someone commits themselves to terrorism, do they give up their right to justice when they so blatantly abuse it? How can we allow someone to rely on Human Rights law when they have so obviously overlooked the human rights of everyone else in the country? On a more local level, why do we have someone at liberty in Britain who has been convicted of terrorism in another country? Why were they being granted freedom of speech, and freedom to gather audiences, when it was known that they had fundamentalist tendencies and links with terrorist organisations? Is it our policy in Britain to say 'welcome to Britain and feel free to hate our society and way of life?'

It would be wrong to withdraw many of our fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech because we are scared of what people might say - but surely when there is evidence that people have gone beyond what are acceptable societal boundaries then they need to be restrained in one way or another. Is this not what the new anti-terrorism provisions are seeking to do? Finding a way of tackling fundamentalism without resorting to fascism is going to require some common-sense in terms of interpreting the law.

Nobody wants to see a repeat of the shooting of the innocent Brazilian on the underground system, but neither do people want to encounter suicide bombers. For years there have been critical news reports on Isreali soldiers shooting Palestinians who they believed to be suicide bombers, many of whom may have been innocent, as well as reports of suicide bombers blowing themselves up in buses and bars - now the reality of this is hitting Britain. There is no way to stop a suicide bomber but to kill them before they detonate themselves. Equally, there is no way of being absolutely sure that somebody is a suicide bomber until they actually detonate themselves. There lies the Catch 22 which will dominate the British legal system for years to come. Here we believe that someone is innocent until proven guilty, but by the time a suicide bomber is proven guilty it is too late.

So where does this leave us? If we can identify the underlying factions that are stirring up fundamentalist ideals, is it not common-sense that we either imprison or deport them? Even the Muslim Council of Great Britain supports such moves. However, we need to make sure that the extremists don't win by lulling us into a fascist state out of fear, and hence we become what they are propagating we already are. It will be common-sense that wins, not fascism, but it needs to be applied through the judicial system, not just in Government.

Eddie Blass is a freelance academic and ghostwriter specialising in business & management, futures, legal, and educational issues.


MORE RESOURCES:

Scientific American

Body Politics: The Power of the Visual in Electoral Debates
Scientific American - 1 hour ago
On that night, (between 9:30 and 10:30 Eastern time), our understanding of the power of the visual image in politics entered a new era. ...
Fighting casino links in US presidential debates Daily Nation
all 54 news articles


Modesto Bee

Along North Carolina highway, sagging economy intersects with politics
The Miami Herald, FL - 4 hours ago
By BARBARA BARRETT ALONG HIGHWAY 11, PITT COUNTY, NC -- Highway 11 runs through the heart of Pitt County in North Carolina, southward through fields still ...
Along North Carolina highway, sagging economy intersects with politics Bradenton Herald
all 15 news articles


Truthdig

The politics of smear won't work in the middle of a stockmarket crash
guardian.co.uk, UK - 16 hours ago
Obama, she claimed, has been "palling around with terrorists and launched his political career in the living room of a domestic terrorist". ...
Video: McCain Counters Obama 'Arab' Question AssociatedPress
Voter Anger and McCain's Mistake American Daily
McCain and the loss of decency Examiner.com
all 80 news articles


Hot for Halloween this year: Politics, sex, Batman, Hannah Montana
Detroit Free Press, United States - 8 hours ago
Both say political costumes are big this year. At the front of the West Bloomfield store, a mask of Sen. Barack Obama was next to the mask of Sen. ...


Politics takes a pass at site of historic campaign
Chicago Tribune, United States - 20 hours ago
But don't expect to find much talk about politics in the birthplace of the modern political campaign. Only a handful of campaign signs are on display in the ...


WELT ONLINE

US-POLITICS Summary
Washington Post, United States - 23 hours ago
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrat Barack Obama has opened a 6-point lead over Republican rival John McCain in the US presidential race, according to a ...
THE MANAGING PERSPECTIVE: Hate has no place in politics UNLV The Rebel Yell
Callers put a little heat on politics Port Huron Times Herald
Politics inspire looks at candidates, issues NewsOK.com
New York Times - Louisville Courier-Journal
all 2,021 news articles


BBC News

The Politics of Fear Comes Back to Bite McCain
North Star Writers Group, MI - 6 hours ago
This is what McCain gets, for embracing the politics of fear and playing around with the word “terrorist” – an even larger polling deficit and increased ...
Video: McCain Links Obama To Ayers CBS
McCain Fights the Weather Underground, but Doesn't Know Which Way ... Political Affairs Magazine
Dog-day politics has its dark side as Nov. 4 nears Orlando Sentinel
AFP - Chicago Sun-Times
all 4,848 news articles


The Age

The circus that's called politics
Hillsboro Times Gazette, OH - 2 hours ago
Politics has been an interest of mine ever since my earliest memory of my late Aunt Clara Furlough. No one took the American political system more seriously ...
Sarah Palin is just awful, volume 900 411mania.com
Forward with Obama Toledo Blade
Hate Speech From Crowds Dominates McCain/Palin Rallies DiversityInc.com (subscription)
LimaOhio.com - The Baltimore Chronicle
all 367 news articles


Sports and Politics: Having a Special Place Together in this World
New University Online, CA - 6 hours ago
Sports and politics keep a safe distance, for the most part. However, there is always that slight and sometimes heavy influence one may play on the other. ...


New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson speaks on diversity in politics
UNLV The Rebel Yell, NV - 6 hours ago
Richardson said involvement in the political process is essential for young and minority voters who, up until now, haven't been as involved. ...

Politics - Google News

home | site map
© 2006